Every week we will give away
four pairs of free movie tickets!
The movie tickets are valid to see
any movie of your choice at any
Cineplex, Ciné Entreprise or Guzzo movie theatre!
Just write your own review about any
movie published on CinemaQuebec.com
and give it a value between 1 and 10.
The promotion is valid for Canadian residents only.
Wonderful movie, most enjoyable. Saw it in 3D, that worked well with the excellent special effects. My wife and youngest son also thought it was great.
|9/10||huskymike@ - 290 reviews|
30.4.2016 - age: 50+
This movie was a bit disappointing for me. I saw Snow White and the Huntsman and I think it was a far better movie. It had a better story line, character development, action and acting. I think people are a bit harsh on Kristen Stewart. I think she made a good Snow White. I enjoyed Charlize Theron but I enjoy her in any movie. I just thought The Huntsman was a let down. Very predictable on the whole and a bit hokey!
|6/10||c.j.mcelroy.007@ - 5 reviews|
29.4.2016 - age: 50+
That movie was so bad, so bad. Jessica Chastain, Charlize Theron, Emily Blunt - three accomplished actors and still the movie was so bad. That's because the story was really dumb. Really dumb. I know this is fantasy but this was beyond fantasy to think that one could build a kingdom in a frozen waste land. [[Really dumb to think that people can go on a quest with no food, no protection agains the elements, no sleeping gear - oh wait some blankets magically appeared.]] Must be a fantasy. And the sound was horrible. I am wondering if the actors spoke strange accents because the sound was bad or was the sound bad because they spoke strange accents. Don't see this movie. If you did, you would be wasting two hours of your life.
|2/10||les.francey@ - 75 reviews|
24.4.2016 - age: 50+
Really enjoyed the lifelike and seamless graphics interface between Mowgli and the CGI animals. The kid did a pretty good acting job as well. A great movie for elementary age kids and up to retirement age geezers like myself. Don't recommend it for younger children. Pretty intense for preschoolers.
|10/10||michael@ - 12 reviews|
20.4.2016 - age: 50+
Ok... I do not like animation... this is the exception. Just incredible. Disney, Jon Favreau and his team did an incredible job. The best way to see it: IMAX 3D. Do not forget to stay for the credits at the end.
|10/10||drjwatters@ - 14 reviews|
24.4.2016 - age: 50+
I went in with low expectations (as I do with all movies now), and I was surprised with how hard I found myself laughing. Not only was it hilarious, obviously this is dependent on your sense of humour, but it was also empowering to women and girls (though I wouldn't suggest people under 13 see it) Having been a on-and-off "Brownie" in my childhood, I found it relatable in that sense as well. Over all, I laughed a lot more than I do in most comedies I have seen lately, and coming from someone who isn't big on comedies in the first place, I think it says a lot that I enjoyed it and would see it again.
|7/10||sabrina@ - 12 reviews|
23.4.2016 - age: 18-25
Saw it today. Terrific road movie, albeit slow at times. Diane Kruger is wonderful and appears in nearly every scene. What a game changer for Norman Reedus, who you can't help love with his tough, yet sensitive side. Laurene Landon steals the film with her improvisational skills and tragic, yet hilarious at times performance. I could watch her for days.
|8/10||danielspeaks@ - first review|
22.4.2016 - age: 36-49
Incredibly well done!! Extremely enjoyable for adults too. My only criticism is that it is far too scary for children under 6. Makes me want to go walking in a jungle!
|10/10||deanna.brewer@ - 15 reviews|
19.4.2016 - age: 36-49
Not for everyone that's for sure but I liked it. If you like first person video games and violence, you'll probably like it too. If you suffer from motion sickness, you're probably going to have trouble watching it. The story is pretty basic for what there is and the action while alright is not spectacular. What is neat is the fact that the movie is shot from the first person from start to finish. If you have any interest, see it on the big screen as I imagine it will lose some effect on the smaller screen. If you're interested, this camera angle has been done before but not for the entire movie in Humphrey Bogart's 1947 film Dark Passage.
|7/10||parker_2@ - 509 reviews|
17.4.2016 - age: 36-49
If you like first person shooter games, you'll definitely like this movie. Doom had a segment of the movie that did this and I wished the whole movie was like that. They did a good job of incorporating almost every weapon possible, including tanks and choppers. And one of the scenes reminded me of Nazi Zombies. The plot line was not the greatest, but if you're going to see this movie for plot line then you're a complete retard. The name says it all so I hope you're not squeamish. This is a first of its kind and not to be missed.
|9/10||tony.montana@ - 3 reviews|
11.4.2016 - age: 26-35
BEAUTIFUL! JUST A PHENOMENAL, AMAZING MOVIE! The film was SO well done from the locations, to the actors, to the known facts about our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ's younger days! You will feel the love through this film and come to a new appreciation of what the life of the Messiah would have entailed in those times. Praise and Glory to the King of Kings and Lord of Lords! Go see the film, you will not regret it, I promise!
|10/10||evangelist.isabelle@ - 5 reviews|
9.4.2016 - age: 18-25
Very well done. Hopefully something can be done about the problems that shouldn't exist in the first place. In the name of God they shouldn't be in the church.
|10/10||gail.o.neill@ - 9 reviews|
9.4.2016 - age: 50+
Delightful movie with stellar performances, most notably by Maggie Smith. The film was thought provoking on many levels and particularly as it relates to the guilt felt by Ms Smith's Catholic character even though the church treated her so poorly. This is the kind of movie you're still thinking about three days later.
|9/10||wastewar@ - 30 reviews|
6.4.2016 - age: 50+
All in all it is an okay movie, could have been better, could have been a lot worse, go see it for yourself and decide for yourself Okay what can I say about this movie when it was first announced I was like yes we are getting a Batman VS Superman movie but the marketing for this movie took me to where I didn't have high hopes for the movie. The casting did not have me going oh what a great casting choice. The trailer with Doomsday had me going "oh the Dark Knight returns meets Death of Superman" even before seeing the movie. So when it turned out to be exactly that I was called it. Now lets get into what was good about this movie first off Ben Affleck as Batman was Perfect, Gal Gadot in this movie was okay and worked in the movie but I'm still not seeing her as the best casting choice for Wonder Woman and in this movie she didn't show that she could lead her own movie. The cameo appearances for the Flash, Aqua Man and Cyborg where done the right way and didn't take you out of the movie. The Bad about this movie first off it did not flow just watching this movie you could tell that there was too many deleted scenes to get it under a certain time. Superman was bland and dull and if it was not for Henry Cavill it could have been even worse. Lex was a lot worse that what I thought he would be though he dose have some of the best lines in the movie.
|7/10||deejaydjs@ - 40 reviews|
2.4.2016 - age: 26-35
It's a waste of cool shots, cool storyline, cool villain... waste of everything actually because it's tries so hard to be deep it ends up being all surface. It's a jumbled mess of ideas, plots, and characters. Snyder has some beautiful shots, but that could barely hold my interest. Just felt like Dc is desperate.
|3/10||kr00k3dn0s3@ - 28 reviews|
2.4.2016 - age: 26-35
Ok, who remembers the REAL Star Wars movies? How long (ie, how many YEARS) was it before these were released to VHS and BETA? And how many YEARS was it before you would even see these on TV? Well, come April 5th, a mere short handful of months after this FARCE was in the theaters, it is being released to DVD and wait for it... ooohhh with some deleted scenes! Oh joy!!! How many suckers will jump at that and waste their money? Come on this was and never will be close to being like or better than the original Star Wars and it is, at best, moderately better than the previous 3 Star Wars movies (thank God we didn't have any Jamaican sounding aliens in this one, although I recall seeing a Chinese sounding and somewhat looking one...) Yep, the FARCE awakens alright... when will you?
|1/10||clifft@ - 17 reviews|
4.4.2016 - age: 36-49
Incredible: Depiction of Christ, the TRUE & ONLY MESSIAH. Flawless acting (I second this comment) Directing, cinematography Great for unbeliever and beliver MUST SEE.
|10/10||awatikai@ - first review|
28.3.2016 - age: 26-35
About the time that Superman appeared before Senate committee, it was clear the S on his chest stood for "stupid". This film was so awful only the explosions kept me from sleeping through it. Only the luminous Amy Adams kept this from being a complete disaster. The atmosphere was ugly, the villain too weird, and the only threat of danger was that the movie wasn't going to end. The worst.
|3/10||p.u@ - 17 reviews|
29.3.2016 - age: 50+
Worth seeing, but I did not enjoy how much time was spent on Batman and his emotional rollercoaster of dreams and feelings. A couple of solid scenes would have been enough. I would have liked to see more Batman versus Superman moments where they have mini battles only to have one final one at the end. Their final fight was kinda boring. The ending was cool but all in all I found it dragged and in the end it could have been so much better. Henry Cavill is so good. Ben Affleck was better than I expected, Amy Adams will forever remain a bad choice for Lois Lane (I do like her though) In the end this is a movie about superheroes and it fell so short on that scale. Sorry.
|7/10||jashley778@ - 22 reviews|
28.3.2016 - age: 36-49
This is a tough one to describe. I enjoyed it despite the numerous characters and lack of time to make sense of it all. The best actors were Lawrence Fishburn (as Perry White) and Jeremy Irons (as the butler/technician Alfred) I could add Gal Gadot ( Wonder Woman) but her role was too short to make sense. Easily the most annoying character was Lex Luthor, played by Jesse Eisenberg. Lex reminded me of a methamphetamine addict who cannot keep a straight conversation. The movie had too many stories to cover in just 2.5 hours, but it worked anyway, sort of. Some modern problems were written into the story, such as Superman branded as an illegal alien from Krypton, and Bruce Wayne as an out of touch rich bastard. Both heroes were close to retiring in order to hide from some bad PR until Lex Luthor brings them together in his evil but childish scheme. Wonder Woman is eye candy and a capable actress though her character added nothing to the story. I'm surprised Donald Trump was not there somewhere to stir the plot. Surely he would be a better choice to play Lex Luthor than Eisenberg was.
|9/10||johnbergerdive@ - 21 reviews|
25.3.2016 - age: 50+
I found this movie was a delightful representation of what Jesus boyhood life was like. The actual facts and dates are not of concern to me as we know so little. We do know about the times, however, and we also know that there were many plots to kill him, as a baby, as a boy and then as a man. The screenplay was totally believable, and beautifully acted. This little boy reminded me of what good hearted little boys are like, and also of the wisdom and fearlessness of youth.
|9/10||movie.lover@ - 3 reviews|
16.3.2016 - age: 50+
Excellent film, with excellent acting and script. Pretty faithful to scripture, avoiding significant deviations. Much more Catholic in orientation than I was expecting, especially with the consistently pre-eminent role of Simon/Peter (again, faithful to the Gospels.)
|10/10||burnmax@ - 4 reviews|
20.3.2016 - age: 36-49
I must give it a 10.0. Good script, well acted by all, well explanation of the current family turmoil, in the society, very well presented fast paced family comedy drama. Must see in theatre or other wise the golden opportunity will be missed once it's gone. Movie surrounded the trail which we all are involved, trapped, it's a maze one knows to enter but is incapable of existing. Experience it your self in theatre. Ten plus +.
|10/10||smriti.saigal@ - 42 reviews|
18.3.2016 - age: 36-49
Only dozed off, briefly, twice. Loved the 1st 1/2 to 2/3's of movie but after that... I zoned out, especially with Princess L & Hans looking at each other Rey & Fin were okay additions, while BB 10 or whatever number the new little rolling robot was, is great.
|6/10||richard.sawry@ - 44 reviews|
11.3.2016 - age: 50+
This movie was extremely well acted, made, set and edited. The magic of this movie is not in the story or the narrative but in the beautiful and accurate manifestation of the spirit of God. If you are hung up on story accuracy, that would be a mistake because we have very little information of what happened step by step. However, in case you have not realized this yet, the narrative is not the ultimate goal. The display of the manifestation of the spirit of God through a human being is the goal. Judging this movie by that standard makes it very accurate in its portrayal of the spirit of God through the young Jesus. Done in a very moving and beautiful way. For those purists who worry about the story being perfectly accurate, here's a quick look at John 21:25 "And there are also many other things which Jesus did, which if they were written in detail, I suppose that even the world itself would not contain the books that would be written."
|10/10||glorifiedyou@ - 3 reviews|
13.3.2016 - age: 36-49
Zootopia is a film for everyone, and I don't just say that in terms of age groups. If you're a social-political type like me, this is a great movie to promote discussion. This movie has a unique message, and yet one that's very important and relevant right now. Zootopia is one of Disney's most human movies, even though it doesn't have any humans in it. If you're looking for a good time, go check it out.
|7/10||bermuda.octagon@ - 49 reviews|
10.3.2016 - age: 13-17
High rating comparing it to Ep. I-III. Miles apart from those movies and a great start to a new trilogy. Daisy Ridley holds her own. The 2:16 run time passes quickly.
|9/10||sterling.5.2@ - 23 reviews|
8.3.2016 - age: 50+
I can not remember the last time my wife and I walked out of a movie but we did this one. Usually I look at the breakdown of the ratings on this site. The difference in rating between the age group was huge. Us older types did not enjoy like the younger groups. WORST MOVIE SINCE I CAN NOT REMEMBER WHEN.
|1/10||carl@ - 54 reviews|
7.3.2016 - age: 50+
This certainly was a movie. I wouldn't say it was bad, nor would I say I was particularly moved to any emotion by it. One thing is for sure though, it was a movie.
|7/10||rrrr@ - 30 reviews|
2.3.2016 - age: 26-35
Overrated. Outstandingly beautiful cinematography. Leo... If you're a fan of his you'll be fine with his performance. As a non-fan, he just didn't have enough dialogue to merit a best actor nomination, much less an award, in my opinion. Definitely not a movie one would want to see again. The story was original and interesting in its own way, but it was gory and at times seemed to attempt to be overly so.
|7/10||csm4315a@ - 17 reviews|
29.2.2016 - age: 36-49
A really good horror story that was very well told, written and directed. With next to no special effects or major celebrities, the movie delivered what few Hollywood horror movies have provided recently - true edge of your seat terror. It is quite obvious that the subject and time period was well researched. Highly recommended!
|9/10||mags@ - 40 reviews|
29.2.2016 - age: 50+
I was bored... almost from the beginning and the movie is 3 hours long. Kurt Russel who I normally do like was wooden and his dialog sounded like he was reading the script for the first time. Contrast him with the other actors whose dialogs were interesting in their cadence. Samuel L. Jackson was one of the best in this disaster of a movie. I have liked several of Tarantino's movies... especially Pulp Fiction, Inglorious Bastards and Django Unchained. But this movie had no redeeming qualities. Lots of blood, from bullets and vomit which is a trade mark of Tarantino but just when you think the movie is over... it starts again showing new characters and how they get shot… [[and oh yeah you see a woman get hung... a funny (? ) point of the movie.]] I am not anti-violence in movies... Godfather 1 would not have any impact without it. But gratuitous violence, repeated vomiting of volumes of blood, spitting it into another's face is nothing short of disgusting. I stayed to the end but did not leave satisfied at having seen a great movie.
|2/10||lynxear@ - 29 reviews|
29.2.2016 - age: 50+
If you've seen the first Zoolander, you pretty much get the gist of Zoolander 2. Lots of potty and WIll Ferrell humor. The cameo appearances from the variety of Stars is probably what ate up most of the film budget. A good movie to watch on Netflix.
|5/10||prairiegirl@ - 3 reviews|
24.2.2016 - age: 36-49
Was highly unusual and got better and better as it moved along. NYT's Manohla Dargis wrote a brief review which offered no insight into the creative aspects, script, etc. She criticized it as film for investors, which never even occurred to me. I felt no manipulation at all. I found it seamless.
|9/10||subtle.depth@ - first review|
21.2.2016 - age: 50+
As a baby Christian, I went into this movie with really high expectations and was a bit disappointed. However as another reviewer put it, perhaps it was the lack of Jesus time. I need to remember it is from a non-believer's point of view.. The two persons that came with me were disappointed in it as well. Both were expecting more action I suppose.
|6/10||paulina@ - 30 reviews|
22.2.2016 - age: 50+
I was disappointed to say I was expecting more. The trailers make it look way more suspenseful and spooky than it actually was. It dragged on a bit at the start and didn't pick up until about 3/4 of the way through; that's when it got heated and suspenseful finally. Not the best suspense/horror movie; lack of development and the characters weren't believable.
|5/10||liser1227@ - 32 reviews|
21.2.2016 - age: 18-25
Some funny parts - got a bit melodramatic near the end - did not fit the film in the first half. It was light-hearted until the main character started taking herself seriously, then it was just uncomfortable to watch. Don't think I would pay to see it at the theatre - saw it on the tv instead.
|6/10||luv@ - 44 reviews|
18.2.2016 - age: 36-49
I don't know if it fits under the category of "Masterpiece" but it loved it! Comedy was fantastic, I was laughing so hard I missed some of the jokes. The comedy and action is evenly distributed through out the movie it was so enjoyable that I will go see it again.
|10/10||grace@ - 19 reviews|
14.2.2016 - age: 50+
Very good movie, for the Chinese people, there are subtitles, and the translation isn't exactly to point, so sometimes the subtitles are funnier than the funny phrases (in mandarin.) Plot was a tad slow. Parents please, don't bring in any preschoolers because there is some gore and frightening scenes. Excellent visual effects, definitely worth seeing in 3D, although that's the only option. Exciting plot as well.
|7/10||helena@ - 36 reviews|
13.2.2016 - age: 18-25
Don't let the trailer fool you into thinking that the reviews are wrong. The movie was boring, confusing, and had an extremely uncomfortable scene where Channing Tatum sings. Was close to walking out. Not the worst, but definitely avoid in theaters if you have high expectations.
|1/10||alie@ - 8 reviews|
8.2.2016 - age: 13-17
Cracks are beginning to appear in the delusion we are being fed, of living in a democracy. What Smedley Butler and Dwight Eisenhower have warned us about years ago has manifested itself. No living person has attempted to bring this to our awareness more consistently than Noam Chomsky. Banned from National Petroleum Radio (a prime example of the corporate takeover of public arenas) Noam Chomsky continues, at age 87, to warn us of the consequences of not becoming active.
|10/10||oddvark@ - 2 reviews|
1.2.2016 - age: 50+
This was one of the best films my wife and I have ever seen! The script / plot, acting and directing were all impeccable, brilliant and captivating. On every level, every measurement this movie was such a joy to witness, though tough in many instances. It is a shame that such a powerful film, because it was an independent movie has no chance against ' the Hollywood machinery' for awards and recognition. Skip every other movie out there and ensure you treat yourself to a powerful human story of love, adaptation and survival.
|10/10||pbull@ - 20 reviews|
10.2.2016 - age: 50+
I love, love story movies. This one is another very good one in that category. It has you guessing what the end might be. Love comes in many ways, this movie is about one more way love comes to us, and how love can be tested. If you like love story movies, this is one more not to miss seeing.
|8/10||keith@ - 28 reviews|
8.2.2016 - age: 50+
I don't know why there is so many bad reviews on this movie. If you [like] post-apocalyptic movies, you will or should like this one. Awesome movie I thought!
|10/10||brentturville@ - 89 reviews|
2.2.2016 - age: 50+